pBOS Objective Inquiry
Posted: May 27th, 2008, 4:33 pm
I'm in a tie up with what I'm going to go with for winning objetives. There are two possibilities I'm considering between. First, before going anyfurther, if you have seen the terrain preview thread, you will know that there's four bases for each side. With the given layout, the lane flow for outside lanes have a two spawn coverage, while the middle lanes have a three spawn coverage. Needless to say the outside bases will be more vunerable than the middle bases, which is my considerations for the objectives I will list.
The first objective I have in mind, is to kill all bases, and as I have planned bases should be easy to replace however doing a good chunk into economy. Replacing middle bases will have a harder impact than outside bases. Essencially the method to win would be to pretty much fully deplete and overwhelm/overpower the other side. It would more than likely result in longer games than the second objective, it would also require a more long run type of planning and long term wits. Though probably longer games, theoretically sealing the other team's fate should be able to be achieved soon, but not always, it should have a higher variance for it up and down.
The second objective I have in mind, is to simply kill any one of the middle bases. Outside bases will be replacable, and like the first objetive they will do a good chunk into the economy. The method to win would still be deplete the other team to some extent, however not on as big of a scale as the first objective, more than anything it will be to overwhelm/overpower. The point of finalizing a kill should be faster than the first objective, and will more than likely be short team planning and short term wits.
Realistically, yet theoretical, both objectives will have a common scenario of being the same result. To with with second objective it's more than likely you'll need to wipe out both side bases to knock off one of the middle bases. One-sided wrapping in the First Objective could very well be or often the sealing fate for victory.
Which do you think I should go with, and why?
The first objective I have in mind, is to kill all bases, and as I have planned bases should be easy to replace however doing a good chunk into economy. Replacing middle bases will have a harder impact than outside bases. Essencially the method to win would be to pretty much fully deplete and overwhelm/overpower the other side. It would more than likely result in longer games than the second objective, it would also require a more long run type of planning and long term wits. Though probably longer games, theoretically sealing the other team's fate should be able to be achieved soon, but not always, it should have a higher variance for it up and down.
The second objective I have in mind, is to simply kill any one of the middle bases. Outside bases will be replacable, and like the first objetive they will do a good chunk into the economy. The method to win would still be deplete the other team to some extent, however not on as big of a scale as the first objective, more than anything it will be to overwhelm/overpower. The point of finalizing a kill should be faster than the first objective, and will more than likely be short team planning and short term wits.
Realistically, yet theoretical, both objectives will have a common scenario of being the same result. To with with second objective it's more than likely you'll need to wipe out both side bases to knock off one of the middle bases. One-sided wrapping in the First Objective could very well be or often the sealing fate for victory.
Which do you think I should go with, and why?