Page 3 of 4

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: January 16th, 2009, 1:51 pm
by DarnYak
Storamin wrote: How bout this:

I'm a fiscally conservative, socially liberal republican.
That's libertarian, not republican

DarnYak

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: January 16th, 2009, 2:23 pm
by DarkNemesis
DarnYak wrote:
Storamin wrote: How bout this:

I'm a fiscally conservative, socially liberal republican.
That's libertarian, not republican

DarnYak
ditto

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: January 16th, 2009, 3:00 pm
by jamn455
DarkNemesis wrote:
DarnYak wrote:
Storamin wrote: How bout this:

I'm a fiscally conservative, socially liberal republican.
That's libertarian, not republican

DarnYak
ditto
Is this post really necessary?

I think not.

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: January 16th, 2009, 4:12 pm
by Tehw00tz
All in all, what the fuck does this have to remotely do with EotA Lore at all?

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: January 16th, 2009, 4:13 pm
by jamn455
Tehw00tz wrote:All in all, what the fuck does this have to remotely do with EotA Lore at all?
ditto

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: January 16th, 2009, 4:33 pm
by DarkNemesis
jamn455 wrote:
Tehw00tz wrote:All in all, what the fuck does this have to remotely do with EotA Lore at all?
ditto
Is this post really necessary?

I think not.

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: January 16th, 2009, 4:36 pm
by Storamin
jamn455 wrote:
DarkNemesis wrote:
DarnYak wrote:
Storamin wrote: How bout this:

I'm a fiscally conservative, socially liberal republican.
That's libertarian, not republican

DarnYak
ditto
Is this post really necessary?

I think not.
Imagine if people on the internet said...

"Self, is this seemingly worthless post on the internets really necessary?"

... before hitting that Submit button.

For example: Imagine if the person that posted this on the internet hadn't done so. I know I would be sad...
Image

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: January 16th, 2009, 5:00 pm
by DarkNemesis
I did notice how you replied to my post and not Jamn's, this leads me to believe you are in on the troll fest.

Jamn just posted a response as an excuse to attack, flame and otherwise troll. You know this to be true, yet you refuse to do anything about it.

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: January 16th, 2009, 5:10 pm
by jamn455
Actually, I posted my first response as an honest thing saying that ditto wasn't a good response to a post. Then, I rethought my position and decided that I liked the word and pokemon too damn much not to accept it.

Image

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: January 16th, 2009, 11:41 pm
by CryptLord1234
. . .Admins/Mods, is it at all possible to congregate all of this Nemesis vs. Jamn stuff into one thread for the following reasons?

1) It would be nice to not have it boil over into other topics.
B) Everyone would get a laugh out of it.

Also: Nemesis, you come onto this board and I'd have to say about 60, 70% of your posts are pretty annoying. Do you really expect to have allies in this discussion? Every single thread in recent history is IMMEDIATELY derailed when jamn posts something in a topic you discussed.

L2IgnorePeople.

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: January 17th, 2009, 12:15 am
by Perhaps
It's keeping to forums active. I'll give them that.

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: January 17th, 2009, 12:19 am
by CryptLord1234
Perhaps wrote:It's keeping to forums active. I'll give them that.
Eh. Maybe with the release of EotA 1.12, many will come to see the light, the trolls will be burned, and the forums will live happily ever after.

. . .Ok. I had to try.

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: January 17th, 2009, 9:03 am
by jamn455
This thread was discussing the political systems of the EotA races. They began to talk about books and shit like that.

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: January 17th, 2009, 11:01 am
by DarkNemesis
jamn455 wrote:This thread was discussing the political systems of the EotA races. They began to talk about books and shit like that.
Jamn is right, strangely enough.

So what form of government, if any at all, do the new hero(s) (Tyrant) have?

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: January 17th, 2009, 11:20 am
by jamn455
I would say that the Glacial Tyrant is a fan of tyranny and the many forms of government that come with it.

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: January 17th, 2009, 2:38 pm
by Tehw00tz
Glacial Tyrant is not the head Pit Lord, there are Pit Lords before him that are more powerful. They don't fight though, keeping in the custom that big bad leaders of other factions that can onehit anything but don't go into battle.

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: January 17th, 2009, 4:09 pm
by jamn455
It's pretty clear that the Glacial Tyrant is Deinnov's child which was sent to rule the Antarctica district of the Legion of Pitlords.

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: January 17th, 2009, 7:57 pm
by Ion
DarkNemesis: "Some of Ayn Rand's could be considered 'Conservative'."
Ion: "OMG, why would you say that!!??? How can you say that??!?! It's so *&%^&$^$^& terrible, aaghghhgghg!!!!!"
I like how here it looks like you have a point (except you're missing the word "views"...)and I use exclamation marks and questions marks like I have down's syndrome (but I spell everything properly).

Oddly enough...
Are you really this stupid Jamn?????
I didn't call him a Liberal as a put-down for argument foothold, don't know were the hell you got that idea. I called him one because he is....honestly???!!!?
Heh.
LIGHTEN UP, ION.
And no, your argument wasn't to the point, actually, for the most part, it was a bunch of BS and bitching.
I've leave with thus:
SOME OF AYN RAND'S COULD BE CONSIDERED CONSERVATIVE
Caps is the best way to express your anger so it's probably a lot safer to say you need to lighten up, but it's hilarious having you on here so I don't see any real need to right away. On second thought stay angry.

Also, although you're trying to sound intelligent, "I've leave with thus" does not make any grammatical sense. In fact, it so impedes your argument it might even be fair to say you are slowly bringing into consideration my first point (down's ftl). I think you meant "I'll leave with this", though evidently it's pretty hard to make that many typos. So we all have to wonder!

Since you refuse to refute or affirm my previous questions on your first language, I'm just going to have to assume it's not English. If you'd like to speak in your native language, I'd be happy to comply (so long as I too speak it). Perhaps that would reduce some of the communication problems you're obviously facing in English.

Also, if you remember my point was:
Conservative is a terrible word to describe Ayn Rand's views.
You could consider them conservative, but that's a terrible way of describing her views and you'd have to be either really lazy, really love labels or be completely ignorant to what they were. Saying that she was a laissez-faire capitalist and her own radical theory of objectivism is a lot better at getting across what she actually believed in (and even better would be to describe objectivism but that would be a complete waste of time both for the writer and reader).
if your too ignorant to see this, well then, I feel sorry for you.
Cheers.
You probably want to put me in your prayers. Keep up the posts, you are the most entertaining person on this forum!
It's pretty clear that the Glacial Tyrant is Deinnov's child which was sent to rule the Antarctica district of the Legion of Pitlords.
It's Deinnov's daughter. She's a cold hard bitch and it basically shows up in her magic. Badass.

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: January 18th, 2009, 12:24 pm
by Storamin
Image

its quite cute!!!!

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: January 18th, 2009, 12:34 pm
by jamn455
Not as cute as this.

Image

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: January 18th, 2009, 2:42 pm
by Ion
You guys try but my only motivation to come here is to see if Dark's posted.
He's the greatest.

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: January 18th, 2009, 10:37 pm
by Storamin
jamn455 wrote:Not as cute as this.

Image

not as cute as Dark's mom.

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: January 31st, 2009, 4:27 pm
by Discombobulator
Storamin wrote:
DarkNemesis wrote:We "Christians" only refer to cap locks when you ignorant heathens don't listen. :wink:

Cruise cool, Storamin! :) (And whatever you do, DON'T label anything "Liberal" or "Conservative". Especially when your referring to politics and social issues!! :roll:)
How bout this:

I'm a fiscally conservative, socially liberal republican.
You're stingy?

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: February 1st, 2009, 11:01 am
by Storamin
Discombobulator wrote:
Storamin wrote:
DarkNemesis wrote:We "Christians" only refer to cap locks when you ignorant heathens don't listen. :wink:

Cruise cool, Storamin! :) (And whatever you do, DON'T label anything "Liberal" or "Conservative". Especially when your referring to politics and social issues!! :roll:)
How bout this:

I'm a fiscally conservative, socially liberal republican.
You're stingy?
if by stingy you mean living under my means. then yes :) stingy it is.

the rest of america: take note

Re: Politically correct.

Posted: February 1st, 2009, 11:06 am
by Discombobulator
Storamin wrote:
Discombobulator wrote:
Storamin wrote:
DarkNemesis wrote:We "Christians" only refer to cap locks when you ignorant heathens don't listen. :wink:

Cruise cool, Storamin! :) (And whatever you do, DON'T label anything "Liberal" or "Conservative". Especially when your referring to politics and social issues!! :roll:)
How bout this:

I'm a fiscally conservative, socially liberal republican.
You're stingy?
if by stingy you mean living under my means. then yes :) stingy it is.

the rest of america: take note
You lack patriotism.